Giancoli 7th Edition textbook cover
Giancoli's Physics: Principles with Applications, 7th Edition
6
Work and Energy
Change chapter

6-1: Work, Constant Force
6-2: Work, Varying Force
6-3: Kinetic Energy; Work-Energy Principle
6-4 and 6-5: Potential Energy
6-6 and 6-7: Conservation of Mechanical Energy
6-8 and 6-9: Law of Conservation of Energy
6-10: Power

Question by Giancoli, Douglas C., Physics: Principles with Applications, 7th Ed., ©2014, Reprinted by permission of Pearson Education Inc., New York.
Problem 33
Q

A sled is initially given a shove up a frictionless 23.023.0 ^\circ incline. It reaches a maximum vertical height 1.22 m higher than where it started at the bottom. What was its initial speed?

A
4.89 m/s4.89\textrm{ m/s}
Giancoli 7th Edition, Chapter 6, Problem 33 solution video poster
Padlock

In order to watch this solution you need to have a subscription.

VIDEO TRANSCRIPT

This is Giancoli Answers with Mr. Dychko. The total energy of this sled initially equals the total energy that it has, in the final case, after it gets to the top of its slope. And initially, it has 0 potential energy because we will take the initial height to be the reference level and then it goes up some ramp and then it gets to a new height. And when it gets there, or you know, it doesn't quite get to a flat part, it gets to some maximum height along this ramp; its kinetic energy will be 0 because it will stop there and it will have only potential energy. And the potential energy it has at the top is mgh and the kinetic energy it has in the beginning is one-half m v initial squared and we can cancel the m's, multiply both sides by 2 and then take the square root of both sides. And we get the initial speed must have been square root 2 times 9.8 meters per second squared times 1.22 meters, which is 4.89 meters per second.

COMMENTS
By owenwelker474 on Wed, 9/20/2023 - 9:21 PM

Why would the Eq. V² = Vo² + 2ax not work for this eq? Also doesn't the -a need to be FgX?
Thanks - Owen

By owenwelker474 on Wed, 9/20/2023 - 9:18 PM

Why would the Eq. V² = Vo² + 2ax not work for this eq?
Thanks - Owen

Find us on:

Facebook iconTrustpilot icon
Giancoli Answers, including solutions and videos, is copyright © 2009-2024 Shaun Dychko, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Giancoli Answers is not affiliated with the textbook publisher. Book covers, titles, and author names appear for reference purposes only and are the property of their respective owners. Giancoli Answers is your best source for the 7th and 6th edition Giancoli physics solutions.